Scaling Systems

⚠️ This document is outdated. The Narrative Perspective Argument (linked here) dismantles all scaling systems for SCD — with the sole exception of RFES, which is built outside of narrative perspective. This doc is preserved only for historical/archival purposes SCALING SYSTEMS - First off, we will define scaling systems as metrics of value. Point of this doc: prove how Scaling Systems are logically necessary when scaling Smart Characters Debate (and how they are also subjective because they require answering to questions that mostly require personal feelings) Intelligence is a complex matter, not even close to being solved in real life. Even an agreed upon definition isn't really existent. When we try and apply metrics of intelligence in fiction it becomes neither easier nor more difficult, it becomes simply a different matter. This is because of many things. Those things being: -⭐⭐⭐incoherency problem. Authors are bounded by 1 story and 2 their personal intelligence. Those two boundaries cause incoherencies in intelligence that massively gap the inconsistencies in real life. IM NOT SAYING INCONSISTENCIES IN INTELLIGENCE IN REAL LIFE AREN'T A THING, I'M ARGUING THAT THEY ARE DEEPLY MORE EXPONENTIAL IN FICTION. So question: should we just pick the parts of the story where the character excels in? -⭐⭐⭐⭐non bound to explanation problem. In real life statements (even from third parties) are rooted in REAL kind of intelligence, whether in fiction a statement holds little …