Patrick Jane PF Analysis - DEBUNK

Hello, I'm Federal-Manner3880. Some of you might be wondering what this “PF Analysis” even is so here's a link- https://docs.google.com/document/u/0/d/1459z3D8y_Ss4eRfXMZZxh-L_R6ZO1MbXA9sxk48pTUQ/mobilebasic Be sure to read that doc before reading this one because I will NOT be doing a recap. That said, let's get on with the debunk. — The doc creator, Arthen wrote:- * 1) Patrick didn’t look in her direction. 2) Patrick was able to see van Pelt shuffling only via peripheral vision 3) He guessed the dealer’s card before she finished shuffling…First, for Patrick to shuffle the cards in the deck, he would need to see how she's shuffling, but he wasn’t looking in her direction. It means that he either knew how she would shuffle or he has unrealistic vision, which makes his peripheral vision as clear as his central vision. I pick the second variant, you’ll ask me why and I’ll say because it is the most conservative version…In this article(linked in the doc), you want to find the Lorenz equation which is directly connected to the butterfly effect. It states that the chaotic system is very sensitive to its starting conditions. There’s an example of the Lorenz equation so it's almost impossible to predict it. So I’ll choose the 2nd variant since it’s the most conservative one. So Patrick’s vision (perception) is unrealistic…Patrick had to move 72 cards per second around in his memory palace. I'll be addressing the first three points, but to do that, I have to deal with the ones …