Doc

DN: Tennis PSI debunk

Also listed as: DN Tennis PSI Debunk

This entry was filled in automatically; the author may be wrong. Suggest a correction.

File

Google DocSaved

3 pages441 wordsSaved 2026-11-15

Open the original Google Doc

Text preview
Light and L PSI debunk made by : scd_scal489 original doc: here What the original DOC says debunk Let's begin: Light and L felt the tennis match 9-12 times slower than a normal person The Fallacy of Literal Interpretation: Slow Motion is a Narrative Device -Slow motion paired with a character's internal thoughts is one of the oldest and most common tropes in filmmaking and animation. Its purpose is to give the audience insight into a character's thought process during a high-speed or high-stakes moment. -The scene is slowed down for us, the viewers, so we can comprehend the complex strategies L and Light are devising in the span of a single tennis rally. If the scene played in real-time with their thoughts voiced over, it would be a chaotic, unintelligible mess. The author of the document even admits this when quoting Miracle, "thinking way too fast for our mind," but fails to see that this supports the "narrative device" argument, not their own. -The document notes that the characters' voices are at a normal human speed during these sequences. This is a fatal flaw in the "literal perception" theory. If you were truly perceiving the world at 1/12th speed, your own internal monologue would also feel 12 times slower to you. The combination of slow-motion visuals and normal-speed audio is definitive proof that this is a cinematic convention designed to layer two different timescales for the audience's understanding. -If we apply the logic of the original document, then …

The first lines of the plain-text copy. Formatting and images are only in the PDF/DOCX.

Listed in